Average Customer Review:
 ( 78 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
90 of 92 found the following review helpful:
 Fine Camera, what a Point and Shoot is supposed to beSep 01, 2009
By Juan Carlos R. Laguardia
"Stat Grad Student"
Already being an owner and user of two different camera types, DSLR and film, I felt I was missing out on the point and shoot category. So, I researched upcoming cameras in June and heard about Panasonic's new Lumix lineup and didn't wait any time to pre order this guy. It is very compact (smaller than a deck of cards) with a serious range 8x zoom. Just be sure you want a camera that takes all the manual control of picture taking before you buy it. There is almost no manual settings, other than choosing which "scene" you think your shot will be. Panasonic has some fun settings - Pin Hole, film grain, and the key word that people love "High Dynamic" mode, which is their attempt to create a High Dynamic Range type of shot. They also have an underwater setting, for those who will later shell out the money for the casing to take this baby in the pool or some other form of wet. The Leica name on the lens is what got me looking at panasonic cameras, and as far as I can tell, its a fine lens. It is no DSLR, but it is a great incognito camera.
Video is Average, but I wasn't really concerned about it. -- When I say average, I'm comparing it to video I've seen taken from a camcorder. The HD component is nice, but you'd need to be still holding it and hope whatever you're filming is not moving too fast for a great recording.
77 of 79 found the following review helpful:
Buying decision: 720p HD Video, 8x Zoom, Power O.I.S.Oct 27, 2009
By I. Besenfelder
The Lumix ZR1 is a very good snapshot and HD video camera.
I got the ZR1 around a month ago and I am still enthusiastic. The most important things besides picture quality were for me, that the cam should be fast and able to zoom while recording HD video. I hate the low res VGA videos, the older generation cams made. You can't use them for anything. My first reference was the Lumix ZS3, which is a really good camera and it had all I wanted... Until I found out, that some experts claimed that the "Mega Optical Image Stabilizer" works a bit slow, so that when taking snapshots there is a longer focus time. But I was lucky, that Panasonic just released this little beauty here. The ZR1 uses a newer much faster OIS, called "Power OIS", which is even faster than most other snapshot cameras, while canceling camera shakes very well. So for me there was no time to wait and get this thing.
If you are not so focused on speed, check out the ZS3!
Main differences between the SR1 and the ZS3:
SR1:
- 12MP
- Zoom-able 720p HD Video
- Power O.I.S.
- 8x Zoom
- 2.7" display
ZS3:
- 10MP
- Zoom-able 720p HD Video
- Mega O.I.S.
- 12x Zoom
- 3" display
Comments on the comparison:
- Megapixels aren't the point anyway, because even 8MP are very enough for the normal user, but I had to mention the difference.
- Both cams record the same HD Video, so that's also no point
- The OIS made a difference for me: "Power" is faster than "Mega". I think they just fixed a software issue here.
- Zooming while recording video is a nice and (by this time) rare feature at snapshot cameras. Either zoom, 8x and 12x is huge! Of course 12x would be better than 8x, so this point goes to the ZS3.
- Also the display of the ZS3 is bigger.
Conclusion: If you don't care how fast your stabilized auto focus is (perhaps you use tripods so that you don't need a OIS, or have always time to make your shoot - it's really NOT that bad, it's just a bit slower), get the ZS3 (zoom and display is better)! Otherwise the ZR1 is perfect (fast and still fat zooming).
166 of 178 found the following review helpful:
 Not up to expectationsNov 07, 2009
By Ganesh Ramamoorthy
"Scientifix"
After reading the reviews of both Panasonic ZS3 and Panasonic ZR1 and I decided to check out the ZR1 as it was supposed to have the newer/better image stabilization and smaller in size. The size was definitely small enough and image stabilization was decent. The picture quality was quite good in bright light conditions but lower in low-light conditions, but this seems to be an issue with any of the digital cameras at this price point.
But where it really disappointed was in the video mode. I noticed that when I switch the mode dial to the video mode the brightness of what was displayed on the camera's LCD screen became much lower compared to the photo mode. First I thought that this may be just an issue I'm seeing on LCD screen but when I transferred the video and watched it on my laptop and my TV I saw that the videos in fact looked dulled out compared to the photos. So pretty much any video that is shot indoors looked dull and kinda of poor quality.
I then decided to try out the ZS3 also and immediately saw that this issue isn't there in the ZS3. To capture video on the ZS3 you don't have to change the mode dial but simply have to press a "record" button and I don't know if this has anything to do with this, but the videos were as bright as the photos on the ZS3. So the videos shot indoors are much better, both brighter and better quality, with the ZS3 compared to the ZR1.
I also did comparisons of photos taken by the two models and surprisingly I felt the ZS3 was better there too (despite the fact that ZR1 boasts 2MP more). Also, I didn't find the image stabilization of ZS3 in anyway inferior to that of ZR1.
So after all my side-by-side comparisons I found the ZS3 to be definitely a better camera which I have kept and returned the ZR1. The ZR1 is definitely more compact than the ZS3 and does have quicker start up times (and possibly even faster zoom times). But, at the end of the day, in my opinion the ZS3 is a superior camera when it comes to videos and even photos, with the additional zoom capabilities (12X of ZS3 vs 8X in ZR1).
54 of 57 found the following review helpful:
Be realisticDec 17, 2009
By Kate
Stop the nonsense! This is a tiny camera - smaller than a deck of cards with an F3.3 lens and a necessarily tiny ccd, and people are expecting low light capability from it. Get real! Photography requires light. When you give this little thing light, it does an amazing job! Yes the images at night with poor incandescent light and without flash are grainy. Does anyone remember the grainy images from film cameras with pushed 400 iso? If you want a low light camera, get a big heavy camera with a large sensor and a nice F1.8 lens. If you want a tiny gem of an engineering miracle that takes sharp, well exposed, true colored photographs, get this little Lumix ZR1! It does everything one can rationally expect, given the laws of Physics, and does them extremely well!
32 of 33 found the following review helpful:
Good, but I like the ZS3 betterJan 07, 2010
By B. Bass
I spent a lot of time lately reviewing compact digital cameras. I knew that zoom was one of my highest priorities so I ended up settling on the panasonics. I have now owned both the ZR1 and ZS3 and I prefer and will keep the ZS3, although it is a very close call. Both cameras are pretty much the exact same as far as operation and menus go. They each have iA and normal modes, to go along with twenty something scene modes like high sensitivity, high speed burst, portrait, starry sky, fireworks, etc... There is definitely the most control in Normal Picture mode, and that is the mode I take almost all of my pictures in. I never use the iA (intelligent auto) mode. While they are billed as fully automatic cameras with no manual controls, you can choose the sensitivity (ISO 80-1600, auto), adjust the exposure (-2 to +2 eV), choose a minimum shutter speed (1 to 1/125 for ZR1, 1 to 1/250 for ZS3), which , while it is not capable of extremely long exposures, it is effective at forcing a very fast shutter speed if you are trying to get action shots. You can also set the white balance. Both cameras also have a button for a quick menu which brings up relevant parameters you might want to alter in that mode so you don't have to scroll through the menus. For instance, in normal mode, if you press the quick menu button, Auto focus mode, white balance selection, ISO, picture size, aspect ratio, burst mode, LCD power all pop up on the top of the screen for easy access. I only wish that the minimum shutter speed control would also pop up with the quick menu, Each camera also comes with an extended optical zoom, where you can get an extra zoom by reducing the picture size. With this feature, the ZR1 moves from a 8x zoom to 15.6x, and ZS3 goes from 12x to 21.4x. Here I must give a point to the ZR1. The ZS3 puts a much greater emphasis on video, and I really don't care about video. There is a little red button on the back of the ZS3 that automatically records video, you don't have to be in motion picture mode. In its place on the ZR1 is an E. zoom button. This button automatically zooms the camera to full tele (8x) and if you press it twice it automatically extends the lens to its full capabilities, 15.6x. On the ZS3, you have to go to the menus and manually lower the picture size to attain your extended zoom, rather than just press a button. I like the ZR1's take on this much better, but if you care about video, you might like this part of the ZS3 better.
Of the two, the ZR1 is quite a bit smaller, and weighs 50% less. I didn't know how much of a difference this actually makes until I actually held both of them in my hands. If size is your number one priority you might want to go with the ZR1. I never wear jeans, so I'm not sure how well it would work with them, because I know some people have complained about the ZS3 not being pocketable. I always wear basketball shorts or wind pants, and the ZS3 easily fits into my pockets. Though it is heavier and therefore feels less comfortable and less natural, I also have had no real problems using the ZS3 with one hand. The ZR1 also focuses a little faster than the ZS3, though this difference only becomes really noticeable when zoomed in under low light conditions. Both cameras seem to take about the same amount of time to extend to their fullest zoom, but the ZR1 can retract back to wide angle a little faster. The ZR1 starts up marginally faster than the ZS3, though this is also barely noticeable. When on a tripod, the image quality of both is good, I couldn't tell a difference really in the two on my computer screen, but there is noticeable noise at low light in both starting at ISO 200. If anything, I think the ZR1 actually reproduces colors a little better than the ZS3, though neither one is bad. The ZR1 also has pretty good battery life for a compact camera. It actually uses the exact same battery as the ZS3, which has a much greater power need, so the ZR1 will get good battery life, and noticeably better than the ZS3. Where the ZR1 falls short is on indoor photos. The ZR1 has a much narrower aperture, so it lets in less light. This makes it hard to take photos in low light, and as a result, you must use a slower shutter speed, which will result in blurry pictures when taking handheld pictures. I would say that about half of my pictures taken inside with the ZR1 came out blurry. Panasonic says that this isn't a problem because of the new Power O.I.S., but image stabilization can not fix everything. I am also not convinced that the Power O.I.S. is any better than the older Mega O.I.S. At any rate, more of my pictures came out blurry with the ZR1 than the ZS3. Also, the newest Panasonics, released January 2010, are equipped with Mega O.I.S and not Power, which is kind of interesting.
ZR1
Pros
- SMALLER SIZE AND WEIGHT!
- Feels more comfortable in hand, looks sleeker, more attractive
- E. zoom button in place of movie record button
- Better battery life
- Slightly faster focusing, especially when zoomed in under low light
- Faster response in general (very slightly)
- Has two additional scene modes that ZS3 doesn't have
ZS3
Pros
- Wider minimum aperture lets it take much CLEARER HANDHELD PICTURES
- EXTRA ZOOM
- BETTER LOW LIGHT PERFORMANCE
- Better HD video, with an HDMI out port
- Better overall image quality
- Shutter control down to 1/250 second instead of 1/125
- I believe the ZS3 burst mode is a little better
- Higher resolution screen
Overall, the ZR1 is a very good camera I think, unless you plan to do a lot of indoor shots. I never use the flash with a camera if I can help it, so if you plan on using the flash whenever you are inside, the ZR1 will be fine for you. Without the flash, it was just too hard to get a clear shot indoors, especially if you have the lens extended at all. It is your typical compact camera size, with good speed and picture quality, and the best zoom I could find in a camera this small. I'm used to using my parents' camera which is a lot higher end and has much more as far as manual controls, but there are not a lot of choices in compact point and shoots with manual controls. It is extremely easy to use, I don't think anybody will really have a problem operating it. The menus are very intuitive, and the quick menu will pop up most of the things you might want to fiddle with to get the picture you want. The camera also feels very good in the hand, and feels like it is made well It comes with a CD that is the user's manual, which does a pretty good job of explaining what all the scene modes and features of the camera do. For a camera with no manual controls this one does have a lot of features, and does give you more control than just point and shoot as some would imply. I was generally well pleased with the picture quality of this camera for the price. I guess you just have to be realistic and realize that one this small cannot excel at everything, and this camera was made for good lighting rather than indoor shots.
See all 78 customer reviews on Amazon.com
|
based on 78 reviews
